قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Science / 11 Things Climate Change ‘Dismissive’ People Say On Social Media

11 Things Climate Change ‘Dismissive’ People Say On Social Media




<div _ngcontent-c14 = "" innerhtml = "

It is clear that the climate is changing and there is a human component on top of the naturally variable system. Most climatologists understand this, and the Most Logical People The fourth national climate assessment report is a good place to find affirmation for these statements. Every year, Yale Climate Communication's group and George Mason University scholars question the American public on their views on climate change, this study is always a certain percentage that falls into a category called "Dismissal. " According to the authors of the study

the Dismissivo are very certain (climate change) is not happening and are actively involved as opponents of a national effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. [1

9659004] At present, the percentage is about nine percent .Although their number is low, they are often very noisy, Persis tent, aggressive and vitriolic in social media.In the course of time, I noticed 11 "Attempt to lay off" on social media.

2018 Six Americas results Yale Climate Communication

Ice Ice. & nbsp; Ice age always seems to come and some statements about natural cycles, it's honestly astonishing that this happens since most climatologists are very aware of the various ways in which the climate changes naturally.The discussion on climate change is not a discussion "/" or ". It is a discussion "and". The grass grows naturally, "and" grows differently with the fertilized soil. Trees fall naturally in the forest, "and" can be cut down by a chainsaw.

That magazine article of the 1970s. & nbsp; Apparently there was a 1975 Newsweek article that ran a story about a cooling world. "" It's fun to see how often this is mentioned in social media. As he wrote earlier in Forbes,

No, an article in a magazine, some people and some publications said that they were not the majority of scientists or scientific studies. The writer of the article of that magazine has even debunked this same

Citing a random study I call this study craze. Over the years, I have seen people criticizing peer review literature. They talk about how unreliable or partial it is. Although there are certainly problems with literature, he is still an important guardian against bad science in the same way that the FDA is for bad food or drugs. Here is the kicker though. As soon as you see a study that supports a confirmation bias point of view "" they are ready to cite the study to support their point.

"Grand Poobah Effect". & nbsp; I watch it often on social media. A person does not necessarily have a strong background in climate science but relies on some scientists or personalities to talk about points or to validate their positions. They often mention or tag that person in their posts on social media. I call it effect "Grand Poobah" and I have already written it before

Doubt and its merchants . Usually there is a sample of comments on scientists and money. This statement illustrates a lack of understanding of the process of granting the sciences. Here is a good "101" at this link . There are rigorous processes for obtaining grants based on scientific inquiry and analysis. There are also "other" funding models and gray literature publications designed to defend certain positions or misinformation. & Nbsp; Merchants of Doubts by Naomi Oreskes and Erik Conway is a good book to dig deeper into the Ultimate Quest .

Credentialing & nbsp; This is the era in which a "Tweet" presumes to have as much weight as a degree or years of scientific inquiry. Dunning "- Kruger Effect" is fully effective on social media. One strategy often used is "I have a degree in (compile the preferred discipline that is not climate science or climatology)" or "I study this in my spare time while in my basement eating biscuits."

Deviation . Another tactic that is known is the creation of deflection questions. This is usually an "apparently intellectual, provocative or irrelevant" question that has the intent "of getting public" to the climate scientist.

It's cold. This winter I'm sure you've seen this: " It's cold or snowing, so global warming does not have to exist. " No, it means that the day or the week is a manifestation of the time. Heating is not "where you live". It is not "my little part of the planet on this particular day" change.

They changed the name. With regard to global warming, there are always a handful of people who find ambiguous intentions in the use of climate change or global warming. I discussed the reasons why this is another "smoke and mirror" tactic in a previous piece by Forbes.

No profile and few followers. & Nbsp; Many of the scornful comments come from accounts with few followers (less than 10) or no profile picture. I imagine these are "robots." & Nbsp; I suppose technically it is not "saying" anything as the title of the article indicates, but you get the point.

Storms have always happened . This is very common. The above comments on the trees that fall in the forest or on the relationship between fertilizers and grass refer to these statements.

I'm sure you can name others who have escaped me, and I certainly hope that I have caught all the mistakes "" because I hyperfocus on those like a laser.

Enough of this, it is time to look at some university circles.

The Six Americas on Climate Change Yale Climate Communication

">

It is clear that the climate is changing, and there is a human component on top of the naturally variable system. part of the climate scientists understands it, and even most of the logical people do it. The 4th national climate assessment report is a good place to find affirmation for these statements Every year, the Yale Climate Communication group and the George scholars Mason University interrogate the American public about their views on climate change: within this study there is always a certain percentage that falls into a category called "Dismissal" to the authors of the study,

the dismissal are very sure that (climate change) is not happening and they are actively involved as opponents of a national effort to reduce gas emissions s errs.

Currently, the percentage is around nine percent . While their numbers are small, they are often very noisy, persistent, aggressive and glassy in social media. Over time, I noticed 11 "grueling" tactics on social media.

2018 The Six American Results Yale Climate Communication

Ice Ice. Ice ages always seem to come and some statements about natural cycles. It is honestly astonishing that this happens since most climatologists are very aware of the various ways in which the climate changes naturally. The discussion on climate change is not an "or" discussion, it is a "discussion", grass grows naturally "and" grows differently with the fertilized soil, the trees fall naturally in the forest "and" can be knocked down by a chainsaw.

The article of a magazine of the years & # 39; 70. Apparently there was a 1975 article in Newsweek that published a story about a "cooling world". It's fun to see how often this is mentioned in social media As he wrote earlier in Forbes,

No, an article in a magazine, some people and some literature articles said that it was not about most scientists or scientific studies .

Citing a random study I call this study craze 1. Over the years I have seen people criticizing peer review literature, talking about unreliability or bias. literature, is still an important guardian against bad science in the same way the FDA is for bad food or drugs. Here is the kicker though. As soon as you see a study that supports a "point of view of confirmation bias", they are ready to cite the study to support their point.

"Grand Poobah" effect. I often observe it in social media. A person does not necessarily have a strong background in the climate sciences but relies on some scientists or personalities to talk about points or to validate their positions. They often mention or tag that person in their posts on social media. I call it the "Grand Poobah" effect and I have already written it before.

Doubt and its merchants . Usually there is a sample of comments on scientists and money. This statement illustrates a lack of understanding of the process of granting the sciences. Here is a good "101" at this link. There are rigorous processes for obtaining grants based on scientific inquiry and analysis. There are also "other" funding models and gray literature publications designed to support certain positions or misinformation. Merchants of Doubts by Naomi Oreskes and Erik Conway is a good book to deepen this last

Credentialing This is the era in which it is assumed that a "Tweet" has the weight of a degree or years of scientific inquiry. The "Dunning – Kruger Effect" is fully effective on social media. An often used strategy is "I have a degree in (preferred discipline field that is not climate science or climatology)" or "I study this in my spare time while in my basement eats cookies."

Deflection . Another tactic that is known is the creation of deflection questions. Usually they are random questions, apparently "intellectual, provocative or irrelevant" that have the intent of "public tricks" for the climate scientist.

It's cold. This winter I'm sure you've seen this: "It's cold or snowing, so global warming does not have to exist." No, it means that the day or the week is a meteorological manifestation. Heating is not "where you live". It is not "my little part of the planet on this particular day".

They changed the name. With regard to global warming, there are always a handful of people who find ambiguous intentions in the use of climate change or global warming. I discussed the reasons why this is another "smoke and mirrors" tactic in a previous piece by Forbes.

No profile and few followers. Many of the scornful comments come from accounts with few followers (less than 10) or no profile picture. I imagine these are "robots". I suppose technically it does not "say" anything as the title of the article indicates, but you get the point.

Storms have always happened . This is very common. The above comments on the trees that fall in the forest or on the relationship between fertilizers and grass talk about these statements.

I'm sure you can name others that I've missed, and I certainly hope I've caught all the "typos" because they focus on even those like a laser.

Enough of this, it is time to look at some university circles.

The Six Americas on Climate Change Yale Climate Communication


Source link