قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / Amy Klobuchar’s not-so-subtle troll of Hillary Clinton

Amy Klobuchar’s not-so-subtle troll of Hillary Clinton

"We will be in Iowa and Wisconsin, we are starting in Wisconsin because, as you recall, there were not many campaigns in Wisconsin in 2016. With me, the changes … There will be a lot."

If you do not gets the reference, it is to this: Hillary Clinton lost Wisconsin to Donald Trump in 2016, the first Democrat to lose Badger status since 1984. Clinton believed that State was in the stock exchange, and did not campaign there during the election race general. Not just once.

"If there's a place we were taken by surprise, it was Wisconsin, the polls showed us comfortably, to the end, they also look good for the democratic race at the Senate, Russ Feingold: 1

33 employees in the field and spent about $ 3 million on TV, but if our data (or someone else's data) showed we were in danger, we would obviously have invested even more, "he writes. "I would have demolished my program, which was designed based on the best information we've had and camped out there."

The inability to visit Wisconsin became, for many Democrats, the symbol of the fatal flaw of the Clinton campaign: you simply took for granted the Midwest Industrial and saw Trump conquer Wisconsin, Michigan, and # 39; Ohio and Pennsylvania, and with these states, the White House.

While some rumors have emerged after the incredible loss of Clinton that questions the strategy of his campaign in the Midwest, most Democratic politicians – especially those who have the intention of being the candidate presidential elections for the party – they avoided direct criticism of the way in which the former secretary of state ran her election campaign. This reticence is usually explained in two ways: 1) Speaking of what the Democrats have done wrong in the past is not a way to solve Donald Trump in the future and 2) Clinton – and her husband – remain prominent figures in the interior Democracy Party and meeting them is not a good idea.

This is what makes the targeted call from Klobuchar to Clinton and her campaign more intriguing.

In case you think – and I know there are some of you out there! – that Klobuchar did not really mean to send a signal that she was a clear break from Clinton's behavior, she considers that the Wisconsin presidential primaries are currently set for April 7, 2020. This is more than two months after the first votes should be launched in Iowa. So, there is no real reason to go there so early, if not as a symbolic way to show that Klobuchar will not take for granted the Midwest – as Clinton clearly understands.

Actually, Clinton's shot could be a sort of necessary by-product of the larger Klobuchar camp to stand out from the rest of the growing sector in 2020: I may not be the best known or better funded candidate, but I know how to win in place that the best known and the best-funded candidate could not do the last time.

Klobuchar announced on the Mississippi River in the midst of a Midwest snow storm to drive that spot home. In case I had lost the obvious symbolism of the background, Klobuchar drove him home in the speech itself. "On an island in the midst of the mighty Mississippi, in the heart of our nation, at a time when we must heal the heart of our democracy and renew our commitment to the common good, I stand before you as the granddaughter of an iron ore, daughter of a teacher and journalist, the first woman elected to the United States Senate from the state of Minnesota, to announce my candidacy as president of the United States, "he said.

All campaigns are fought in the middle of the last race, especially when that last race was a loser. What Klobuchar did is recognize the spectrum in the room, he made it clear that he believes Clinton made a very big mistake and pledged himself not to repeat that mistake.

It is a clear strategy. But is it one of those who pay?

Source link