Connecticut's highest court paved the way for families of nine victims of the Sandy Hook elementary school who were shooting for revenge for the commercialization of the semi-automatic rifle used by Adam Lanza to kill.
Families claimed that the manufacturer, distributor and seller of the weapon carelessly entrusted civilian assault rifles with an assault rifle that is suitable only for military personnel and the forces of the order and violated the Connecticut Unfair Commercial Practices Act (CUTPA) through the sale or illicit marketing of the rifle.
The lawsuit, which lists Bushmaster Firearms International as a defendant, has already passed years of legal obstacles after being presented more than four years ago, more than two years after filming at the Connecticut school left 26 people dead.
Families have issued a statement saying they are "grateful for the fact that the Supreme Court of our state has rejected the offer of the gun industry for complete immunity, not just the consequences of their reckless conduct but also of the discovery process in search of the truth, "said lawyer Josh Koskoff of Koskoff, Koskoff & Bieder.
"The aim of families has always been to throw light on Remington's calculated and profit-based strategy to expand the AR-1
The lawsuit, which was filed in 2015, was filed in 2016 by a lower court, which ruled that arms manufacturers have a wide immunity from liability under a federal law known as PLCAA, the law on the legal trade in weapons. The case was then transferred to the highest court in the state and the decision to go ahead was issued Thursday.
At the hearing in November 2017, Koskoff stated that the company targeted people like the marketing shooter Sandy Hook, using "images of soldiers in combat" and referring to "missions" where they could guns be used.
"Remington may never have known Adam Lanza but had been courting him for years," Koskoff said in the 2017 hearing.
Defense attorney James Vogts conceded at the same hearing that "what happened at school that morning was horrible".
But, Vogts quickly added, "the law must be applied dispassionately. The manufacturer and sellers of weapons used that day are not legally responsible for his crimes and his damages."
ABC News & # 39; Meghan Keneally and Emily Shapiro contributed to this report.