قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / World / From NATO, new proof that Belgium and Germany are pathetic allies

From NATO, new proof that Belgium and Germany are pathetic allies



NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg released his 2018 report on the alliance on Thursday. It offers new evidence that Belgium and Germany remain exceptionally pathetic NATO allies. This is important because NATO is an alliance on which rests much of the security, prosperity and freedom of the world.

Unfortunately, the actions of the Belgians and the Germans continue to betray their words. At the 2014 NATO summit in Britain, each nation of alliance formally agreed to move to allocate at least 2% of its GDP to defense and at least 20% of its defense equipment supply budget. What did Belgium and Germany do in the following years? Not so much.

Consider the new NATO data. First, take a look at each nation's defense spending as a percentage of GDP (for the context, the United States spent at least 3.34% of GDP on defense in 201

4-2018).

In 2014, Belgium spent 0.98% of the defended GDP, and Germany spent 1.18 percent. The following years:

2015: Belgium: 0.92, Germany: 1.18
2016: Belgium: 0.92, Germany: 1.19
2017: Belgium: 0.91, Germany: 1.23
2018: Belgium: 0.93, Germany : 1.23

These numbers demonstrate the lies of both governments in their 2014 agreement. Statistics show that no nation wanted to invest in NATO's common defense.

Now, let's look at equipment spending as a percentage of the total defense expenditure of each nation. The objective of the equipment is important because the equipment offers action tools for the allied strategy against an enemy. We bring the United States here for an annual context.

In 2014, Belgium spent 3.52% of its total defense budget on equipment. Germany spent 12.94 percent and the United States spent 25.97 percent. The following years:

2015: Belgium: 3.44, Germany: 11.93, USA: 25.41
2016: Belgium: 4.66, Germany: 12.21, USA: 25.05
2017: Belgium: 6.41, Germany: 13.75, USA: 25.73
2018: Belgium: 9.80, Germany: 14.13, USA: 25.27

Observe the differences. While Belgium gets some credit for increasing equipment spending to around 10 percent, it is still a long way from what it should have done. And Germany? His numbers bear witness to a destroyed army, whose best elements are even reluctant to deploy. Sure, there's a follow-up question here. If these nations don't even reach their 20% equipment targets, then where are they spending the rest of their defense budgets?

The answer: on the personal. In 2018, Belgium spent a whopping 72.06 percent of its staff defense budget, and Germany spent 46.97 percent. This is how the defense spending appears. Defense spending for jobs, rather than defense. The objectives of the equipment exist precisely to prevent it.

Belgium has the honor of hosting NATO headquarters. It benefited from the American intelligence that saved hundreds of citizens. Then, c & # 39; chancellor Angela "Nord Stream II" of Germany Merkel. Merkel, who the columnist Jennifer Rubin calls the leader of the free world, has proved to be completely different. And in its neglect of the allies, Merkel has betrayed other European NATO powers such as Britain and France.

Stoltenberg recently told Washington Examiner that he will push Germany to do more in defense, but evidence suggests that Merkel will not listen. The leader of Europe's largest economy is satisfied with the current status quo, in which the United States represents 50.1% of total NATO GDP and 70% of total NATO defense spending.

Merkel is the freeloader-in-chief. And sorry, the generous spending on German foreign aid does not count for Western security for the simple reason that the aid trucks will not stop Russian tanks.

  Screen Shot 2019-03-14 at 3.18.53 PM (2) .png

(Screenshot / NATO)

Trump should defend NATO unequivocally by continuing to invest in an army capable of defeating any threat. But the NATO report also gives Trump another lesson. It shows that the president's anger in states like Germany and Belgium is both necessary and morally required. The next time Trump speaks to NATO, he should directly blame by name those leaders who dare to laugh, like Merkel and Belgian Charles Michel. It would do well to say that NATO is moving to London or Paris and that Germany is losing its US military bases in Poland.

Let's see if they laugh then.


Source link