UNITED NATIONS – U.S. Ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley was called for a showdown Thursday on a historic statement by the United States to have the world body formally condemn Hamas for its terrorist activities against Israel – a battle that if successful, it would have been a success for the departing ambassador.
The United States has urged the United Nations to nominate and condemn Hamas for months, even if the UN passed a resolution after its resolution by criticizing and condemning alleged crimes and violations of international law by Israel. Hamas has control of Gaza, where about 2 million Palestinians live since 2007 and has fired hundreds of missiles into Israel in recent months.
A draft of the non-binding resolution, as seen by Fox News, condemns Hamas to "repeatedly launch rockets on Israel and incite violence, thus putting civilians at risk." It would also require that Hamas "and other militant actors, including Jihad Palestinian Islamic ", cease all provocative and violent actions; and condemns Hamas' efforts to build tunnels to infiltrate Israel and launch missiles in civilian areas.
It would be the first condemnation of Hamas by the General Assembly, and Haley should speak to the debate before the vote – which could eventually
ISRAEL, HALEY ACCUSES AN IGNORANT ATTACK OF "TERRORIST FLAMING SWASTIKA KITES "
A US official told Fox News Friday that they were confident that the resolution would pass. Israeli Ambassador Danny Danon also expressed hope that he would pass and told a small group of journalists last week that the Americans were negotiating the language with European countries to gather their vital support.
But the vote, held in the General Assembly on Thursday afternoon, could easily fail, particularly because the Palestinians and their allies try to crush the push in the final round. The ambassador from Kuwait told journalists Thursday that the Arab group, which he is president of this month, will request that two thirds of the members vote in favor of the resolution (usually requires a simple majority).
A UN diplomat said a second pro-Palestinian amendment sponsored by Ireland could be brought to the room as part of an attempt by the European Union to reach a comprehensive solution to provide "balance" "And to ensure that countries can vote for both resolutions. That resolution would require a "just and lasting peace in the Middle East" and will include an appeal for "the end of the Israeli occupation begun in 1967 …"
The struggle to collect votes in itself fuels the discussion between United States and Israel that the body is solely anti-Israel as it struggles to condemn a terrorist group by name, while regularly approving resolutions that criticize Israel. The United States has argued that the UN has biased against Israel for years, but has stepped up this argument during the Trump administration.
If the resolution were to pass, it would mark a decisive end result for Haley, who moved away from his role as UN ambassador in January and who called for anti-Israeli bias, one of the central features of the his time at the UN president Trump is still to appoint a successor to Haley.
Haley was the central player in supporting the measure, with an American official stating that the US Mission co-ordinated closely with the National Security Council, the White House and the State Department.
Haley wrote to the ambassadors this week inviting them to vote on the resolution, noting that each year the General Assembly adopts more than a dozen resolutions on the Israeli-Palestinian issue, but "none of these resolutions ever mentions Hamas or others militant groups in Gaza ".
In the letter, as seen by Fox News, he warned of potential attempts to terminate the resolution with amendments from other countries and urges members to vote against any amendments "or other efforts to undermine the adoption of the text."
Danon agrees with Haley's emphasis on the importance of the resolution, and Hamas's known efforts to convince member states to vote against the US measure. Hamas had written to the president of the General Assembly, inviting countries to "support international legitimacy in support of the right of peoples to defend themselves and counter these aggressive American efforts".
"How dare Hamas, a terrorist organization, send a letter to the UN?" Danon told reporters on Tuesday. "It is a terrorist organization, it should be condemned on Thursday and I believe we will receive the majority of member states that support this moral resolution."
The United States has been aggressive in its drive to change the status quo to the UN. has pledged its $ 360 million in funding annually to the UN Palestinian Refugee Agency (UNRWA), defended its decision to declare Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and also withdrew from the Council of UN human rights – partly due to the anti-Israeli prejudice that the United States says is present in the body.
In turn, pro-Palestinian countries have amplified their drive to promote the Palestinian cause. The G77 – a blockade of 134 developing countries like Saudi Arabia, Iran, Cuba, China and Venezuela – has elevated "Palestine" to its leadership, increasing the possibility that Palestinians can soon push to be recognized as a member state independent, something that would almost certainly veto the United States
Last month, the General Assembly – as part of a series of anti-Israel resolutions – condemned the alleged "occupation" of the Golan Heights. The United States voted against the decision, a change from the decision to abstain in 2017.