The Irish Supreme Court ruled that the bread sold by the Subway fast food chain contains so much sugar that it cannot legally be called bread. The ruling came in a tax dispute brought by Bookfinders Ltd., an Irish Metro affiliate, which argued that some of its takeaway products – including tea, coffee and heated sandwiches – were not subject to value added tax.
A jury on Tuesday rejected the appeal, ruling that the bread sold by Subway contains too much sugar to be classified as a “staple”, which is not taxed.
“There is no doubt that the bread supplied by Subway in its heated sandwiches has a sugar content of 1
The law makes a distinction between “bread as a staple food” and other baked goods “which are, or come close to, fancy confectionery or baked goods,” the ruling said.
Bookfinders was appealing against a 2006 decision by the authorities refusing to refund the value added tax payments. The lower courts had closed the case before it reached the Supreme Court.
The ruling comes years after Subway suffered an onslaught of bad publicity unleashed by a food blogger who petitioned the chain to remove a bread.found in many products, including yoga mats. In 2014, the famous sandwich chain of his bread.