The President Trump said Tuesday that he is not happy with a bipartisan border agreement in Congress aimed at averting another government arrest, but suggested that he could add to build his US-Mexico border wall and has predicted there will be no another interruption of government funding.
"Am I happy at first sight? The answer is no, I'm not, I'm not happy," Trump told reporters at the White House as he met with Cabinet members.
"He's not going to do the trick, but I'm adding things to, and when you add all I have to add, everything will happen where we'll build a beautiful, strong wall," Trump said.
A number of Senate Republicans were aware of Trump's unease about the deal, but they also noted that he had stopped saying it was unacceptable. Trump spoke with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) On Tuesday's noon deal, a person informed about the call said, although the precise contents of the conversation can not be learned.
Trump's comments came a day later bipartisan negotiators entered into an agreement that would have earned him a small part of the money he tried to build his wall, the problem that led to the partial closure of the government, which lasted a month and ended at the end of last month. Lawmakers and Trump have to face a deadline Friday at midnight to approve new legislation on spending to avoid another stop.
Trump said he did not want and would not accept another government arrest, although he defended what he already had.
"I do not think you'll see an arrest, I would not want to see an arrest, if you have it, it's the Democrats' fault," Trump said. "And I accepted the first one, and I'm proud of what we've accomplished because people learned during this arrest all about the problems coming from the southern border." I accept it, "I've always accepted But this, I would never accept it if happen. "
The bipartisan agreement announced Monday by the first four congressional leaders & # 39; Expense commissions included $ 1.375 billion for 55 miles of new fences along the border, short of $ 5.7 billion a trump had sought more than 200 miles of walls. It withdraws from the demands of the Democrats of new and strict limits to the immigration capacity of undocumented immigrants from the US immigration agency and the customs authorities
Trump did not clarify what he meant by suggesting that he could add an agreement approved by the Congress, but one of the options that the White House officials have strongly taken into consideration is to accept the money that the congress appropriates the new wall funds, and then take further measures using executive actions to redirect billions of additional dollars.
White House chief Mick Mulvaney said last week that he had already identified substantially more than $ 5.7 billion in other taxpayer-funded programs that could be reappropriately funded for building a wall. However, he did not identify what these programs were, and White House officials recognized that any such step could invite a legal challenge.
Conservatives have attacked the agreement reached on Capitol Hill, leading to concerns about the backlash the right could derail. But Trump's statements suggest that the president might end up accepting it, albeit reluctantly.
The leaders of the GOP are desperate to avoid another arrest, after the last forced 800,000 federal workers to pass without pay for more than a month and to enter a host of crucial services from airport projections to inspections on food safety. Polls suggest that the public has accused Trump more than the Democrats for arrest
. The closure ended when Trujmp reopened the government with a short-term spending account that did not give new money to the wall, but gave Congress three weeks to conclude an agreement. That expiration date arrives on Friday evening.
The lawmakers signed the agreement together during hours of ardent negotiations at the Capitol, Monday, after the talks had collapsed over the weekend on new democratic demands on the number of immigrants the ICE may hold. But the conservatives have said that the compromise fails to meet Trump's promises.
"No Republican should support this boundary charade," media conservative speaker Laura Ingraham wrote in a Twitter post on Tuesday morning.
Conservative commentator Ann Coulter wrote on Twitter: "Trump speaks well at the border wall but it is increasingly clear that he is afraid to fight for it, so he calls his" yellow New Deal ".
In previous negotiations, a conservative reaction forced Trump to withdraw, but McConnell welcomed the deal on Tuesday, suggesting that the Democrats had surrendered
"I look forward to seeing the full text as soon as possible and I hope that the Senate can act on this legislation in a short time, "McConnell said in the Senate.
The president also renewed his threat to declare a national emergency to evade Congress and use the army to build the wall, saying, "I am considering everything." Lawmakers on both sides are opposed to a national emergency declaration, and Senate Republicans fear they may have to vote in a vote that could embarrass President.
The agreement reached Monday omits a new and rigorous cap that the Democrats had sought on immigrants held in the United States – as opposed to the border. At the same time, it establishes funding for the average number of detention beds held by the US immigration agency and customs at 45,274 beds, an increase compared to the levels financed in the 2018 budget.
Funding for detention beds had emerged as a flashpoint in the negotiations, as it became a priority issue for both parties. The Democrats aim to limit the aggressive Trump administration control activities, while the Republicans are working to support or expand them.
The two parties gave different results on the result, with the democrats stating that, since the ICE now regularly exceeds the limits of bed financing, the agreement will result in a decrease. Republicans claim that ICE will have the necessary authorities to maintain and increase existing levels of detention
And even when legislators and conservative groups have criticized the agreement, immigrant advocacy groups have started attacking it Tuesday 19659027] Mary Small, a policy director in the Detention Watch Network, called the agreement "an embarrassing defeat for Trump". But he also said that the agreement "makes morally wrong and deeply damaging concessions."
"In particular, this agreement effectively increases the funds available for immigration detention of about 5,000 people a day, helping to increase the deportation mechanism and further increase the risk of immigrant communities across the country", said Small.
The negotiators said that, with the chairman's assent, there would be time to approve legislation and the Senate and will be signed before Friday's deadline at midnight when large parts of the government, including the Department of National Security, they will run out of funding and start closing. The operation would fund all government operations until the end of September, eliminating further closure threats for the remainder of the fiscal year.
Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.) He said he was not surprised by some of the resistance to the plan on the right-hand wing of the GOP. "I think it probably will never be good enough for many people out there," said Thune, who is McConnell's chief vice-president.
Thune said the opposition would probably have influenced Trump's thought "to a point", but it was still possible to gather conservative support for the plan. "I think we can only argue that it will build a wall," said Thune, who spoke positively about the elements of the proposal he has seen so far.
"I am inclined to be for something that gets us out of this logjam that we are in and builds the wall and keeps the government open," said Thune, who added that apparently Democrats "gave much ground" in the dispute over detention beds.
Thune reiterated his opposition to Trump by declaring the national emergency to secure border funding, but added: "that does not mean it will not."
Republican helpers have indicated the new miles of wall money in the deal as a victory, since it is a significant increase over existing levels of funding for new barriers to borders – contrary to the repairs of existing fences – and it was not plausible that Trump would have thrown the $ 5.7 billion he was looking for now that the Democrats would control House.
The White House and Congress leaders have been struggling for months to r each an agreement on a government funding account because of the major differences between Democrats and Republicans over immigration policy.
These negotiators had made steady progress but clashed over the weekend. The White House had largely signaled to the Republicans that it would soften its demand for wall money, convinced that it could use other legal maneuvers to redirect existing funds. Instead, discussions got mired over disagreements over the number of undocumented migrants who could be held at one time. Republicans wanted flexibility in detention rules, arguing that they needed to be able to adapt on behalf of violent criminals and others. The Democrats replied that the changes reputed by the Republicans would give the White House almost unlimited powers to hold as many people as they wanted.
Nick Miroff and Seung Min Kim contributed to this report