The drama provides an eloquent snapshot of the political forces on immigration that tears the cohesion of the Republican Party.
Down from the border, Trump was out of measure, rejecting his dubious claims about immigration while setting the Democrats on fire with fierce new attacks on climate change and abortion
In Washington, under the The Capitol Dome, the Republican legislators have worked diligently with those Democrats themselves on the kind of institutional compromise of Washington that annexes the conventional politics that Trump disdains.
It was not clear what will happen next. But with Trump having fun in the embrace of his adoring and partisan crowd, it is quite possible that he returned to the White House with his reintegrated basal instincts.
In his speech of a & # 39; now and 15 minutes, Trump excoriated the Democrats and repeated false claims that the nearby wall meant huge cuts to the city's violent crime. But the president told the audience that he had chosen not to learn the details of a bipartisan agreement to avoid closure before going on stage. If he really knew what was going on, then he was not able to describe what on paper seems to be a huge disappointment.
This in itself was a clue to the fact that it was not a famous victory to mention that the agreement reached in Washington – which only contains $ 1.35 billion for barriers and no walls – falls well below the president's demands for $ 5.7 billion to fund an electoral campaign that has an almost mystical grip on its base.
I avoided the question Monday night, but Washington is waiting for an answer. What will the next president do?
Will he break the congressional agreement and stand up with his most loyal supporters by refusing to collapse on the wall? Or will it accept the compromise, which could prevent the repetition of a government closure that hurts it politically?
Looks like you keep your options open.
To embrace the agreement reached in the tortuous Congress negotiations, Trump should try to throw a net loss as a victory – a tactic that seemed to suggest during his rally
While his crowd sounded "Build the wall" "- Trump tried to groped a way out:" You really mean "finish that wall", because we have built a lot.
The president said that the assistants had said before the demonstration that it was an agreement was concluded but he did not want the crowd to keep waiting and discover what was in it.
"I could have stayed out there and heard or could have come out there in El Paso, Texas, and I chose you," he said Trump. "Perhaps progress has been made, perhaps not."
But the details were already filtering through the Washington talks on Monday's form of agreement – it's hard to believe that the president would not have been told if the result had been to The height of his demands that triggered the longest government shutdown in history at the end of last year.
He also refused to enter the details of the deal in an interview with Laura Ingraham, a conservative Fox News, has a proven track record of influencing immigration – conducted prior to her event
" Many things have changed, I can not go into details – I just felt very quickly coming to us, "Trump told Ingraham
Stressing the scope of his dilemma, his conservative allies in the House began to mobilize against the agreement.
"While the President was making a big speech at El Paso, Congress was putting together a bad deal on immigration," House Freedom Caucus co-founder, Rep. Jim Jordan, a Republican # 39; Ohio.
Finding a path forward
The conservative media coverage of the agreement will surely be a crucial factor.
If the reviews stink, the President could be encouraged to go forward with a third way forward – bending executive power to finance the wall
At his rally, he seemed to keep this option open too.
"It's called we are preparing the stage," Trump said, before adding: "We need the wall, and it must be built and we want to build it quickly … walls save lives."
"Let's show In the country there is nothing to be afraid of when it comes to the US-Mexico border," said O Rourke. "The eyes of history, the judgment of the future … will come back to look at this moment."
Meanwhile, the President has remained unrepentant, repeating his false statement, which was even debunked by the Republicans of El Paso, that a section of the border wall was responsible for a huge collapse of violent crime in the city.
"They're full of shit when they say they did not make a big difference," Trump told the rally.
"Security is the birthright of every America, and that's why we have to finish the wall."
Trump should declare a national emergency to reprogram the funds to build the wall, he could quickly come across in legal obstacles and worry Republican senators, who fear as a future Democratic president could use such a radical precedent.
But Trump would be able to keep alive the crusade for a wall and my vehement Republican support for the project of political capital.
An option for the White House would be to accept congressional agreement – but then try to use executive power to find other funds elsewhere to unilaterally erect new border barriers.
A complete summary of the agreement between the Republican and Democratic deputies of the House and the Senate is not yet available. But the first signs are that it is well below the demands of Trump, which caused the government's longest arrest in history in December and January for a 200-mile stretch of wall along the border between the United States and Mexico . The project involves $ 1.375 billion of border dissuaders, but includes a ban on concrete masonry and allows only the use of "existing technologies" in border barriers.
Yet, the Democrats rejected a request for a cap on the number of detention centers for undocumented migrants, who had blocked talks over the weekend.
The party had sought the restrictions in trying to handcuff Trump's zero tolerance policy to detain undocumented migrants – even those without a criminal record.
the next few hours will be crucial for the hope that the President can sign the agreement. In the aftermath of the government's shutdown in December, it can be strongly influenced by the way events play in conservative media.
But Congress did its job.
"It's a minute to midnight, we narrowly avoided what would have been a real embarrassment," said David Gergen, a senior CNN analyst who is a former advisor to many Democratic and Republican presidents.
"We have to thank them for doing so … and to say," Mr. President, the next move is up to you, "he added.
CNN's Manu Raju, Phil Mattingly, Jeff Zeleny and Dana Bash contributed to this relationship.